Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - Did We Land On The Moon (Fox TV) [43.49]-- part (1)

reveyy Says:

Sep 15, 2008 - buen video documental

reveyy Says:

Sep 15, 2008 - los mismos de la nasa ponen en duda si mandaron a una tripulacion del apolo 11 por que no encaja y hay muchas discrepancias y anomalias

reveyy Says:

Sep 15, 2008 - los mismos de la nasa ponen en duda por varios herrores que se cometieron y que nunca pensaron que fueran a descubrirse

reveyy Says:

Sep 15, 2008 - esto lo provoco la nasa en poner en duda por errores que se cometieron en los lanzamientos de los apolos y que nunca pensaron que se descubrieran teniendo varias anomalias

reveyy Says:

Sep 15, 2008 - no entiendo por que no puedo publicar mi comentario

germomiter Says:

Sep 29, 2008 - Okay, first of all the most extraordinary event of the 20th century was NOT landing on the moon. It was in fact the invention of Death Metal, AKA the fountain of eternal youth. If this doesn't make much sense to you, it is because you are actually sporting a raging erection for stupid things, such as your boy/girl/trannyfriend. If this does make sense to you I recommend becoming my friend or commiting yourself fulltime to a mental hospital for the clinically insane. I'm running out of letters so

TheUltimateNAV1GATOR Says:

Oct 1, 2008 - My question is... how come we never went back to the moon? (I haven't finished watching the video yet)

mr3865 Says:

Oct 6, 2008 - RIP Don LaFontaine!

kooldog98 Says:

Oct 18, 2008 - after the apollo program ended, there was no real interest in developing technology to put man on another planet. nasa instead focused their funding and research on the space station and mars exploration, and the space shuttle was created as a reusable craft to send cargo into low orbit and build the space station. the apollo program was far to expensive to sustain. there is no point going back to the moon until we learn how to stay there longer than 1 day.

kooldog98 Says:

Oct 18, 2008 - with the space station almost completed, nasa's next goal is to send man back to the moon and onward to mars and they are currently designing the rockets to get them there

ThisIsTimBuck Says:

Oct 18, 2008 - I sure wish I could speak your language.

Easydollars Says:

Oct 22, 2008 - More Freemason Astro nots. All wankers. Up your Neil Armstrong. Living a lie. Scumbag!!!

DudeManSharp Says:

Oct 27, 2008 - Actually, we did go back to the moon. There have been 6 Apollo Missions on the moon between 1969 and 1972. Do you not remember the missions after the first landing where we took the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV)? April 1, 1971 to be exact. We took the LRV on three moon landings after the first one.

DudeManSharp Says:

Oct 27, 2008 - There were actually 6 Apollo missions to the moon, between 1969 and 1972. We did go back to the moon. On 3 of the moon landings we took the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV). Did you forget about those missions?

accountfnax Says:

Oct 31, 2008 - We have never been on earth either... It's an illusion! Really!

Dillbill3 Says:

Nov 5, 2008 - Also If the first steps were taken when Armstrong said his famous line, then how did we get the camera angle that showed him coming down the steps of the shuttle thingy

Uperiwv Says:

Nov 8, 2008 - Welch would be better off if he tried to give some answers to the questions posed. It is outrageous to hear this guy talk while ironically smiling. NASA could at least take the stand: 'Guys, (some of) the photos ARE fake, but we did go to the Moon. We faked the photos to satisfy the appetite of a Hollywood-oriented audience, seeking perfection.' They are not even able to do that. Give answers, folks! The tax payers have a right to know. No question is ridiculous, before it is proven to be.

Uperiwv Says:

Nov 8, 2008 - Welch would be better off, if he tried to give answers to the questions posed. It is outrageous to hear this guy talk, while ironically smiling. NASA could at least take the stand: 'Guys, (some of) the photos ARE fake, but we did go to the Moon! We faked the photos to satisfy the appetite of a Hollywood-oriented audience, seeking perfection.' They are not even able to do that. Give answers, folks! The tax payers have the right to know. No question is ridiculous before it is proven to be.

LunarTuner Says:

Nov 19, 2008 - Try this question: Why SHOULD we have gone back? If there's no compelling reason, I think it makes perfect sense that we didn't return in 35 years.